This medical condition has either been superseded or has become inactive
Specific Conditions |
|
Indication for Ig Use |
|
Level of Evidence | Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Description and Diagnostic Criteria |
FMAIT/NAIT develops because of maternal sensitisation to fetal platelets that possess a paternally inherited antigen. In Caucasians, the antigen is human platelet antigen (HPA) 1a in 80% of cases and HPA-5b in 15%, but other antigens are also implicated. The mother’s antibodies cross the placenta and coat the baby’s platelets, with accelerated platelet clearance leading to thrombocytopenia. This may result in serious and potentially life-threatening bleeding in the fetus or neonate. Pathogenesis is analogous to that of haemolytic disease of the newborn due to red cell antigen–antibody incompatibility. The aim of management of the thrombocytopenic fetus or neonate is to increase the platelet count. If fetal blood sampling reveals thrombocytopenia, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) may be administered weekly to the mother, with or without steroids, until delivery. Recent studies using IVIg weekly from around 20 weeks' gestation, without fetal blood sampling, have shown reduced fetal and neonatal morbidity. This approach may be used for current pregnancies where the condition in a previous pregnancy was not associated with a fetal death or severe haemorrhage. Where a previous pregnancy was affected in the context of demonstrated maternal antibodies, the subsequent pregnancy is likely to be more severely affected where the fetus is positive to the relevant paternal antigen. Testing on maternal blood for fetal DNA or early genetic testing of the fetus (for platelet genotype) by aminocentesis may predict the need to use IVIg. Management of this condition is a specialised area and may include administration of HPA-compatible intrauterine and/or neonatal platelet transfusions. Further information regarding specialised platelet support is available from the Blood Service. Random (non-HPA-matched) platelets may be of benefit in the neonatal setting when matched platelets are not available (Kiefel et al 2006). |
Justification for Evidence Category | Evidence from randomised trials (Berkowitz et al 2006, Bussel et al 1996), case series (Kiefel et al 2006, Yinon et al 2006) and a review (Spencer and Burrows 2001) shows that IVIg modulates the course of this condition. A 2004 Cochrane review (Rayment et al 2005) reported on one randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing IVIg plus dexamethasone with IVIg alone. This RCT was methodologically sound, but too small to detect differences among comparison groups. |
Qualifying Criteria for Ig Therapy |
Prevention or treatment of fetal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
Clinical suspicion of FMAIT in the antenatal setting based on clinical and laboratory features.
Where fetal blood sampling demonstrates there has been a a failure to improve the platelet count, national guidelines recommend the consideration of intrauterine platelet transfusion rather than further Ig therapy. (Ref: Patient Blood Management Guidelines — Module 6 —Neonatal and paediatric, Section 4.2) Prevention or treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
Clinical suspicion of NAIT in the neonatal setting based on clinical and laboratory features.
|
Review Criteria for Assessing the Effectiveness of Ig Use |
Prevention or treatment of fetal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
Cease treatment after the date of confinement/delivery of the baby.
Clinical effectiveness may be demonstrated by:
Neonates with NAIT are eligible under the indication for prevention or treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage. Prevention or treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
Clinical effectiveness of Ig therapy may be demonstrated by:
|
Dose |
Prevention or treatment of fetal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. Prevention or treatment of neonatal thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage.
A second dose may be required.
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information. |
Bibliography |
---|
Berkowitz, RL, Kolb, EA, McFarland, JG, et al 2006, 'Parallel randomized trials of risk-based therapy for fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia’, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 91–6. Bussel, JB, Berkowitz, RL, Lynch, L, et al 1996, ‘Antenatal management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia with intravenous immunoglobulin: a randomised trial of the addition of low dose steroid to intravenous gamma globulin’, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1414–23. Kiefel, V, Bassler, D, Kroll, H, et al 2006, ‘Antigen-positive platelet transfusion in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia’, Blood, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 3761–3. National Blood Authority, 2016, ‘Patient Blood Management Guidelines: Module 6 – Neonatal and Paediatrics’ National Blood Authority, Australia. Rayment, R, Brunskill, SJ, Stanworth, S, et al 2005, ‘Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (Cochrane Review)’, in The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, United Kingdom. Spencer, JA & Burrows, RF 2001, ‘Feto-maternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a literature review and statistical analysis’, Australia New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 45–55. Yinon, Y, Spira, M, Solomon, O, et al 2006, ‘Antenatal noninvasive treatment of patients at risk for alloimmune thrombocytopenia without a history of intracranial hemorrhage’, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 4, pp. 1153–7. |