This medical condition has either been superseded or has become inactive
Specific Conditions |
|
Indication for Ig Use |
|
Level of Evidence | Insufficient data (Category 4a) |
Description and Diagnostic Criteria | Opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia (OMA) is an immune-mediated monophasic or multiphasic disorder consisting of opsoclonus (conjugate chaotic eye movements), cerebellar ataxia, and arrhythmic myoclonus affecting the trunk, the head and the extremities. OMA may be either paraneoplastic or idiopathic, presumably para-infectious (e.g. post-viral). In children, OMA complicates about two to three percent of neuroblastomas. In adults, it may occur in association with several cancers, most commonly small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer. |
Justification for Evidence Category | The Asia–Pacific IVIg Advisory Board (2004) consensus statement summarises several case reports suggesting that IVIg is useful in idiopathic OMA and childhood paraneoplastic opsoclonus-myoclonus ataxia (OMA) associated with neuroblastoma. |
Diagnosis Requirements |
A diagnosis must be made by a Neurologist. |
Qualifying Criteria for Ig Therapy |
Treatment of OMA initially diagnosed in a child
Review by a neurologist is required after the first six months of treatment. For stable patients on maintenance treatment, review by a neurologist is required at least annually. Documentation of clinical effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Second-line treatment of OMA in adults following the use of corticosteroids
AND
Review by neurologist is required after the first six months of treatment. For stable patients on maintenance treatment, review by a neurologist is required at least annually. Documentation of clinical effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. |
Review Criteria for Assessing the Effectiveness of Ig Use |
Treatment of OMA initially diagnosed in a child
IVIg should be used for six months before determining whether the patient has responded. If there has been no benefit after six months treatment, IVIg therapy should be abandoned.
Review by a Neurologist is required after the first six months of treatment. For stable patients on maintenance treatment, review by a Neurologist is required at least annually. Documentation of clinical effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Clinical effectiveness of Ig may be assessed by: On review of the initial authorisation period
On review of a continuing authorisation period
Second-line treatment of OMA in adults following the use of corticosteroids
IVIg should be used for six months before determining whether the patient has responded. If there has been no benefit after six months of treatment, IVIg therapy should be abandoned.
Review by neurologist is required after the first six months of treatment. For stable patients on maintenance treatment, review by a neurologist is required at least annually. Documentation of clinical effectiveness is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Clinical effectiveness of Ig therapy may be demonstrated by: On review of the initial authorisation period
On review of a continuing authorisation period
|
Dose |
Treatment of OMA initially diagnosed in a child
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient.
Refer to the current product information sheet for further information on dose, administartion and contraindications. Second-line treatment of OMA in adults following the use of corticosteroids
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient.
Refer to the current product information sheet for further information on dose, administration and contraindications. |
Bibliography |
---|
Glatz, K, Meinck, HM & Wildemann, B 2003, ‘Parainfectious opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: high dose intravenous immunoglobulins are effective’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 279–80. https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/74/2/279 Kornberg, AJ, for the Asia–Pacific IVIg Advisory Board 2004, ‘Bringing consensus to the use of IVIg in neurology. Expert consensus statements on the use of IVIg in neurology’, 1st edn, Asia–Pacific IVIg Advisory Board, Melbourne, pp. 80–82. http://www.indaps.org/files/1/Consensus%20Statements_0511.pdf%20for%20website.pdf Kurtzke, JF 1983, ‘Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)’, Neurology, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1444–1452. http://n.neurology.org/content/neurology/33/11/1444.full.pdf National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 2006, ‘ Opsoclonus Myoclonus Information Page’. Available from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Opsoclonus-Myoclonus-Information-Page |