Specific Conditions |
|
Indication for Ig Use |
|
Level of Evidence | Clear evidence of benefit (Category 1) |
Description and Diagnostic Criteria |
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired sensorimotor polyneuropathy characterised by a progressive or relapsing/remitting course developing over at least two months with evidence of demyelination on electrophysiological or pathological studies and response to immunomodulating therapies. There is no specific diagnostic test, but characteristic clinical and laboratory findings help distinguish this disorder from other immune mediated neuropathic syndromes. Serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation may be indicated to search for monoclonal gammopathy and associated conditions. |
Justification for Evidence Category | The Biotext (2004) review found one Cochrane review (2002) of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total sample size of 170. The quality of the studies was low–moderate, found intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) improved disability in the short-term, and had comparable results to treatment with plasma exchange or prednisolone. This review was updated in 2013, with two additional RCTs increasing participants to 332. A significantly higher proportion of patients had short term improvement in disability after IVIg compared with placebo RR2.4, NNT3 (high quality evidence). One study confirmed long term improvement over 24 and 48 weeks. IVIg had similar efficacy to plasma exchange, oral prednisolone and intravenous methyl prednisolone in the short term. |
Diagnosis Requirements |
A diagnosis must be made by a Neurologist. |
Qualifying Criteria for Ig Therapy |
Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) for patients in whom walking is compromised or there is significant disability
This indication should be used to cover first line (prior to trial off) treatment of CIDP patients. For patients who have trialled off Ig therapy and subsequently relapse within six months, please use the indication Relapse of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients within six months of commencement of trial off Ig therapy
In adults or children 10 years or older
OR
In children less than 10 years
Where treatment is continued, a review by a neurologist or general physician is required each 12 months. A trial of cessation should be considered each 12 months in patients in remission on maintenance therapy. Once a patient has relapsed in the first six months of a trial off therapy, a further trial might be considered after at least two years. Documentation of clinical efficacy is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Relapse of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients within six months of commencement of trial off Ig therapy
This indication should be used for patients who have previously trialled off Ig therapy and subsequently relapsed within six months. For patients requiring first line therapy (i.e. prior to trial off please use the indication: Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) for patients in whom walking is compromised or there is significant disability
AND
Review by a neurologist is required within four months and annually thereafter (neurologist or general physician). Documentation of clinical efficacy is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Once a patient has relapsed when trialled off Ig treatment, a second line immunomodulatory agent should be strongly considered as additional therapy. |
Review Criteria for Assessing the Effectiveness of Ig Use |
Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) for patients in whom walking is compromised or there is significant disability
Review by a neurologist is required after four months of Ig therapy to determine whether the patient has responded. If there is no benefit after this period of treatment, IVIg therapy should be abandoned.
Where treatment is continued, a review by a neurologist or general physician is required each 12 months. A trial of cessation should be considered each 12 months in patients in remission on maintenance therapy. Once a patient has relapsed in the first six months of a trial off therapy, a further trial might be considered after at least two years. Documentation of clinical efficacy is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Clinical effectiveness of Ig therapy may be demonstrated by: On review of the initial authorisation period For adults or children 10 years or older
OR
For children less than 10 years
On review of a continuing authorisation period
AND
Relapse of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients within six months of commencement of trial off Ig therapy
IVIg should be used for a maximum period of four months (induction plus three maintenance cycles) before determining whether the patient has responded. If there is no benefit after this treatment, IVIg therapy should be abandoned.
Review by a neurologist is required within four months and annually thereafter (neurologist or general physician). Documentation of clinical efficacy is necessary for continuation of IVIg therapy. Once a patient has relapsed when trialled off Ig treatment, a second line immunomodulatory agent should be strongly considered as additional therapy. Clinical effectiveness of Ig therapy may be demonstrated by: On review of the initial authorisation period
AND
On review of a continuing authorisation period
AND
|
Dose |
Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) for patients in whom walking is compromised or there is significant disability
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient.
Refer to the current product information sheet for further information on dose, administration and contraindications. Relapse of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients within six months of commencement of trial off Ig therapy
Once a patient has relapsed when trialled off Ig treatment, a second line immunomodulatory agent should be strongly considered as additional therapy.
The aim should be to use the lowest dose possible that achieves the appropriate clinical outcome for each patient. Refer to the current product information sheet for further information on dose, administration and contraindications. |
Bibliography |
---|
ATS Statement 2002, ‘Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test’, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 111-7. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test. 2002, American Thoracic Society, THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY WAS APPROVED BY THE ATS BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Available from: https://www.thoracic.org/statements/resources/pfet/sixminute.pdf Asia–Pacific IVIg Advisory Board 2004, ‘Bringing consensus to the use of IVIg in neurology. Expert consensus statements on the use of IVIg in neurology’, 1st edn, Asia–Pacific IVIg Advisory Board Inc., pp. 21–29. Biotext 2004, ‘Summary data on conditions and papers’, in A systematic literature review and report on the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and its risks, commissioned by the National Blood Authority on behalf of all Australian Governments, pp. 132–3. Available from: https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/3808068 Bonita, R & Beaglehole, R 1988, ‘Recovery of motor function after stroke’, Stroke, vol 19, no. 12, pp. 1497-1500. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1027.3989&rep=rep1&type=pdf Dunaway, S, Montes, J, Garber CE, et al 2014, ‘Performance of the timed ‘Up and Go’ test in spinal muscular atrophy’, Muscle & Nerve, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 273–277. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24375426 Frommer M & Madronio C 2006, ‘The use of intravenous immunoglobulin in Australia. A report for the National Blood Authority’, ‘Part B, systematic literature review’ Sydney Health Projects Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp. 29–31. Geiger, R, Strasak, A, Treml, B, et al 2007, ‘Six-minute walk test in children and adolescents’, The Journal of pediatrics, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 395-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17382117 Goemans, N, Klingels, K, van den Hauwe, M, et al 2013, ‘Six-minute walk test: reference values and prediction equation in healthy boys aged 5 to 12 years’, Public Library of Sciene One, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1-9. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/432666/3/Six+Minute+Walk+Test+Reference+Values+and+Prediction+Equation+in+Healthy+Boys+Aged.pdf Graham, RC & Hughes, RA 2006, ‘A Modified Peripheral Neuropathy Scale: The Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale’, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 973–976. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16574730 Hughes, RAC, Bensa, S, Willison, HJ, et al 2001, ‘Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy’, Annals of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 195–201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11506402 Hughes, RAC, Bouche, P, Cornblath, DR, et al 2006, ‘European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society’, European Journal of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 326–32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16643309 Kleyweg, RP, van der Meché, FGA & Schmitz PIM 1991, ‘Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome’, Muscle Nerve, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1103–1109. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1745285 Lammers, AE, Hislop, AA, Flynn, Y, et al 2008, ‘The 6-minute walk test: normal values for children of 4-11 years of age’, Archives of disease in childhood, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 464-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675356 Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system, Memorandum no. 45, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1981. MRC Muscle Scale. 1976, ‘Aids to the Examination of the Peripheral Nervous System -Memorandum No. 45’, , Medical Research Council. Available from: https://mrc.ukri.org/research/facilities-and-resources-for-researchers/mrc-scales/mrc-muscle-scale/ Rankin J. 1957, ‘Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60’, Scottish Medical Journal, vol. 2, pp. 200-15. Stroke Engine Canada, 'The Modified Rankin Scale'. Available from Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) – Strokengine Van Schaik, IN, Winer JB, de Haan, R, et al 2002, ‘Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy’, Review, vol.1, no. 8, pp. 491-498. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(02)00222-3/abstract Van Swieten, JC, Koudstaal, PJ, Visser MC, et al 1988, ‘Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients’, Stroke Vol. 19, no. 5, Pp. 604-607. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/215e/00b285abdb1679d4ae7063cff9eb68153184.pdf Zinman, LH, Sutton, D, Ng, E, et al 2005, ‘A pilot study to compare the use of the Excorim staphylococcal protein immunoadsorption system and IVIG in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy’, Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 317–24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16239123 |